Linkedin, You Tell Me…

April 7, 2008

Sigh, Linkedin Taxonomy...

The past few days I have been on a Linkedin spree. Having been remiss in updating my contacts, I finally went on the site and started adding away. Unlike Facebook, it’s imperative that you indicate how you know the person. While I get the logic of that, it’s just not working for me.

To illustrate this, I will use the example of my relationship with the fantastic Rob Cottingham of Social Signal (who received the request below and suggested I write a post on the subject). Rob writes for One Degree, and so do I. For months I saw and laughed at/with his cartoons about social media and read the Social Signal blog. In January of this year, I attended an event at HTCE at which he spoke and I introduced myself. The next month I saw him at Northern Voice where we chatted again. This month, I moderated a panel he was on.

So… er, “Other”, I guess …

\

‘Kay. I go through this process without about 50% of the people I know - we see each other frequently at events, have a good relationship online and off (though we don’t call each other to “hang” - and so the term “Friend” seems a bit presumptuous of me outside of Facebook). And so, out of desperation, I am forced to go with “Organization” and list the first event I met them at. Or the more vague, “Other”…

Anyone else experiencing this?

Entry Filed under: Linkedin, social media. Tags: , , , .

8 Comments Add your own

  • 1. Jenn  |  April 7, 2008 at 4:52 pm

    Yes, I’ve been in this position lots of times…they should add a ‘Business Acquaintance’ option.

  • 2. monicahamburg  |  April 7, 2008 at 5:11 pm

    Thanks, Jenn. Good to know I’m not alone.

  • 3. Rob Cottingham  |  April 7, 2008 at 9:39 pm

    So in an ideal world, here’s the menu:

    - Personal friend
    - Family member
    - Colleague
    - Business friend
    - Partner (you’ve done business together)
    - Members of an organization
    - Blogging buddy
    - Creepy high school acquaintance
    - Can’t remember, too embarrassed to admit it
    - Got drunk together at conference, messed around, not sure how far it went
    - Got drunk together at conference, messed around, absolutely horrifically certain how far it went
    - Someone who was willing to Digg my blog post
    - Frequent teammate in flame wars
    - Let’s face it, I don’t know them… but they’d be one hell of a trophy friend

  • 4. monicahamburg  |  April 8, 2008 at 7:02 am

    I like! That covers most :)

    “The can’t remember, too embarrassed to admit it” might be a way the person could peg them on the other end. I just got one the other day - have no idea if I know the person too embarrassed to ask (I am terrible with names).

    I’d also add the following category: “I think this person is strange, but my friends are OK with him/her, so maybe it’s me… I guess I’ll accept.

  • 5. Kate Trgovac  |  April 11, 2008 at 1:26 pm

    I would also add under “Partner”:

    - Partner (we’ve done BIZNASS together)

    Seriously though, I went through this exact same dilemma the other day - on both the giving and receiving ends. I got a request from someone who said they are a “colleague” .. which isn’t really accurate. Plus I had to do the ol’ “Other” to someone else.

    Ugh.

    Great post!

  • 6. Des Walsh  |  April 11, 2008 at 1:47 pm

    Well caught! That is a terrible piece of design. Rob’s list is great although it does bring back some less than comfortable memories - and some quite hilarious in retrospect.

    But back to the point: if you have a valid email for the person, the trick is to choose Other - which then allows you to enter their email and send the invitation, with or without a personal note (as one who gets and generally ignores lots of boilerplate invites to connect on LI, I strongly recommend a personal note).

  • 7. monicahamburg  |  April 11, 2008 at 9:01 pm

    Thank you, Kate & Des. Good to hear you are both experiencing this! (Misery loves company). Kate, like your suggestion ;) and Des, I’m with you - I tend to send the email. You’re right, adding a personal note is a great idea - and one that I haven’t implemented enough. I have been avoiding that a bit, ’cause I figure if they don’t know who I am we shouldn’t be Linkedin contacts. But then again, as I mentioned before, I’m bad with names - perhaps I should assume others can be…

  • 8. My Vision Of Social Netwo&hellip  |  June 29, 2008 at 10:05 am

    [...] networking life, more on this later). In descending order by intimacy level (also look at this taxonomy in [...]

Leave a Comment

Required

Required, hidden

Some HTML allowed:
<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

Trackback this post  |  Subscribe to the comments via RSS Feed


RSS

Monica Hamburg - Who Am I?

Good question (I wonder this all the time). Essentially, I’m a writer and social media consultant/evangelist in Vancouver, B.C. and am constantly learning related tactics and information. I love researching and my investigations and observations on this phenomenon form the basis of this blog. Oh, I'm also a former actor, pretty good in front of an audience and a contributor to One Degree.

See my website for more information about me (much more), and my humour blog for (hopefully) a good laugh.

Pages

Top Posts

Categories

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Licence.